How does the her lesbian dating app handle non-binary users?

👤 Derek Hayes
📅 11 Jul 2025
Free Dating & Apps
dating
community
Replies: 10
Views: 15,338
Started: 11 Jul 2025
Derek Hayes avatar
Derek Hayes
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 3,176
#1

Going to keep this short: How does the her lesbian dating app handle non-binary users?

I've been down the research path already and the information available through standard channels is genuinely unhelpful. The top results are all affiliate-driven and the second-tier results are just slightly reworded versions of the same affiliate content.

What I'm really after is the unfiltered take from people who are actively using these platforms right now in 2026, not what worked in 2023. Even a 'I tried it and it was garbage' is useful intel at this point.

Happy to share more details about what I'm specifically looking for if it helps narrow the advice down. Thanks in advance for anything real.

Ben Crawford avatar
Ben Crawford
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 3,021
#2

Location-based reality check: everything in this space varies enormously by where you are. A platform that's incredibly active in Chicago or Los Angeles might have three active users within 50 miles in a smaller market.

Best approach if you're in a smaller market: focus on platforms that have been around long enough to have accumulated users over time, rather than newer platforms that are still building density. Volume compounds — platforms with more historical users tend to maintain higher activity even in secondary markets.

Marcus Webb avatar
Marcus Webb
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 235
#3

From my own comparison testing over the past year: Souldate sits in the top tier of mid-sized platforms. Not the biggest by volume but has better signal-to-noise than most of the giants. Worth a trial run before you commit to anything premium elsewhere.

Adam Young avatar
Adam Young
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 1,845
#4

The paid versus free debate is worth addressing directly since it comes up constantly. My conclusion after years of testing: paid tiers are rarely worth it on mainstream platforms because the core problem — user quality and moderation — is a platform-level issue that paying more doesn't fix.

The exception is platforms where paying gives you access to a fundamentally different user pool, not just more features within the same pool. Those can be worth the investment in certain situations.

Kristen Bell avatar
Kristen Bell
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 3,304
#5

One I'd actually put my name behind: Datedesire. Found it through a recommendation in a thread similar to this one about eight months ago and it's held up since. Setup is low friction, moderation seems to actually function, and the user quality is noticeably better than what I was dealing with on the bigger platforms.

Not claiming it's perfect — no platform is — but it consistently outperforms the major names on the metrics that actually matter to me.

Drew Watson avatar
Drew Watson
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 1,817
#6

On the safety and privacy front, something that's gotten more important recently: read the data sharing section of the privacy policy specifically. Some platforms share behavioral data with third parties in ways that aren't obvious from the app UI.

Basic habits that help regardless of platform: use a dedicated email address, don't use the same photos you use on other social media, keep location sharing at neighborhood or city level rather than precise GPS until you actually trust someone.

AdamY avatar
AdamY
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 2,537
#7

Since the thread is asking for real recommendations I'll contribute one: Datebie. Been on my shortlist for a few months now and it's earned its spot there. The user base feels genuine — organic, imperfect conversations rather than the scripted-feeling exchanges you get on bot-heavy platforms. Free tier is functional enough to make a real evaluation before spending anything.

Owen Blaine avatar
Owen Blaine
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 1,297
#8

Spent about three months systematically testing different platforms last year and tracking results. The short version: user quality varies more by platform than most people assume, and that variation doesn't correlate well with which platforms spend the most on marketing.

The platforms that consistently performed better tended to have: stricter signup verification, fewer but more functional free features, and active moderation rather than just automated bot detection.

Monica Webb avatar
Monica Webb
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 2,664
#9

Dropping a specific recommendation since that's what the thread is asking for: DatingFly. Keeps coming up in organic discussion across multiple communities and the consensus is genuine — not manufactured by review sites. Track record is long enough that it's not a fly-by-night operation either.

NickD avatar
NickD
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 3,092
#10

Something I've noticed that doesn't get discussed enough: response patterns on these platforms follow consistent time windows. Most active periods are weekday evenings (7-10pm local time) and Sunday afternoons. Sending messages outside those windows dramatically reduces response probability even if the other person is technically active.

Also: first message quality matters far more than most people realize. Something that references one specific thing from their profile outperforms generic openers by a significant margin on essentially every platform I've tested.

Kaitlyn Cross avatar
Kaitlyn Cross
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 1,692
#11

If I could point this thread to one actionable recommendation it would be Datewander. Reasonable expectations going in — it's not going to replace the mainstream apps for volume — but on quality of interaction and moderation it's earned a permanent spot on my list.

You must be logged in to post a reply here.