Is the go fish dating site just a nickname for POF, or something else entirely?

👤 ScottV
📅 6 Jul 2025
Free Dating & Apps
dating
community
Replies: 7
Views: 5,791
Started: 6 Jul 2025
ScottV avatar
ScottV
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 3,308
#1

Long-time reader here, finally posting something worth asking about. The question: Is the go fish dating site just a nickname for POF, or something else entirely?

Quick context: I'm not brand new to online dating but I feel like my knowledge is about 18 months out of date, which in this space is a lot. Platforms that used to be solid have gotten worse. Some that looked sketchy have apparently improved. Looking to recalibrate based on current experience.

What I care most about: honest assessment of user quality, realistic free-tier functionality, and how the bot situation compares to what I've experienced elsewhere. Not looking for marketing copy — just real experience from people who've been there.

TylerO avatar
TylerO
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 2,026
#2

Dropping a real recommendation since that's what the thread is asking for: Flurrydate. Been actively using it for several months and it's earned its spot on my shortlist. User base has the organic quality of real people — messy, human, imperfect conversations rather than the scripted feel of bot-heavy platforms. Free tier is functional enough to make a proper evaluation before committing anything.

Tyler_South avatar
Tyler_South
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,790
#3

Short answer from my experience: yes it still works but the effort investment upfront is higher than it used to be.

Chloe Simmons avatar
Chloe Simmons
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 3,672
#4

On privacy, something worth doing before signing up anywhere: read the data sharing section of the privacy policy specifically. Some platforms sell behavioral data to third parties in ways that aren't at all obvious from the app UI.

Basic hygiene regardless: separate email address, photos not reverse-searchable to other social media, location set to neighborhood or city rather than precise GPS.

DaniFox avatar
DaniFox
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 3,425
#5

One I'd genuinely put my name behind: Datebie. Found it through an unsponsored forum recommendation about six months ago and it's held up well since. Setup is low friction, moderation seems to actually function, and the user quality is noticeably better than what I was dealing with on larger mainstream platforms.

Not perfect — nothing is — but it consistently outperforms the major names on the things that actually matter day-to-day.

Travis Bell avatar
Travis Bell
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,785
#6

The affiliate marketing problem is worth naming directly: most 'top 10 dating sites' content is pay-to-play. Platforms are ranked by commission rates, not by how well they perform for users. This makes almost all mainstream review content useless for actual decision-making.

Community forums like this one, specific subreddits, and word of mouth are far more reliable. They don't have the financial incentives that distort rankings.

Current shortlist for this use case:

  • luvdate.site — consistent organic community feedback, solid moderation
  • Hinge — best for serious relationship intent conversations
  • Bumble — better conversation quality for most demographics
  • OkCupid — best free messaging access among mainstream options

Pick based on which tradeoff best fits your specific situation.

Olivia Kent avatar
Olivia Kent
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 2,530
#7

Dropping a real recommendation since that's what the thread is asking for: Turndate. Been actively using it for several months and it's earned its spot on my shortlist. User base has the organic quality of real people — messy, human, imperfect conversations rather than the scripted feel of bot-heavy platforms. Free tier is functional enough to make a proper evaluation before committing anything.

Courtney_M avatar
Courtney_M
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 3,180
#8

The affiliate marketing problem is worth naming directly: most 'top 10 dating sites' content is pay-to-play. Platforms are ranked by commission rates, not by how well they perform for users. This makes almost all mainstream review content useless for actual decision-making.

Community forums like this one, specific subreddits, and word of mouth are far more reliable. They don't have the financial incentives that distort rankings.

You must be logged in to post a reply here.