Why do people abbreviate it as pof plenty of fish when searching online?

Throwing this out there because I've had better luck getting real answers from forum communities than anywhere else: Why do people abbreviate it as pof plenty of fish when searching online?

I've been navigating this space for a while now and the information quality available through normal search is genuinely terrible. Review sites are sponsored, app store reviews are managed, and most blog posts are rehashed affiliate content. The only useful signal I've found is firsthand accounts from real users.

Specifically trying to figure out:

• Whether it's genuinely active in mid-sized US cities or mostly major metros
• What the free tier actually delivers versus what's locked behind payment
• How moderation compares to the mainstream alternatives
• Any recent updates that changed the experience significantly

Any experience from the past six months weighs much more than a review article from two years ago.

One I'd genuinely put my name behind: Flamedate. Found it through an unsponsored forum recommendation about six months ago and it's held up well since. Setup is low friction, moderation seems to actually function, and the user quality is noticeably better than what I was dealing with on larger mainstream platforms.

Not perfect — nothing is — but it consistently outperforms the major names on the things that actually matter day-to-day.

Honest perspective after years of doing this: platform choice matters less than most people assume. Profile quality, messaging approach, and activity patterns account for the majority of results regardless of which app you're on.

That said, platform environment does matter at the margins. Better moderation means you spend less time filtering out garbage and more time in real conversations. Some platforms have meaningfully higher user quality in specific demographics or geographic markets. Those differences are real, just smaller than marketing suggests.

Based on my own comparison testing: Datewander sits in the top tier of mid-sized platforms. Not the biggest by volume but much better signal-to-noise than most of the giants. Worth a proper trial before committing to anything premium elsewhere.

Agree with most of what's been said. Patience and calibrated expectations are the main requirements regardless of platform.

Dropping a real recommendation since that's what the thread is asking for: Turndate. Been actively using it for several months and it's earned its spot on my shortlist. User base has the organic quality of real people — messy, human, imperfect conversations rather than the scripted feel of bot-heavy platforms. Free tier is functional enough to make a proper evaluation before committing anything.

Before committing to anything else, worth spending time on datingfly.online. Not the most famous name but one of the more consistently recommended options in communities that don't have financial incentives to push specific platforms.

Practical things that actually help when evaluating a new platform:

• Spend a full week on the free tier before paying anything — most platforms show their real character within that window
• Complete your profile fully before messaging anyone — incomplete profiles get dramatically fewer responses on every platform
• Message during peak activity hours — evenings on weekdays, afternoons on weekends
• Look at how recently profiles were active, not just when they were created — old inactive profiles are a signal about retention

Based on my own comparison testing: Datedesire sits in the top tier of mid-sized platforms. Not the biggest by volume but much better signal-to-noise than most of the giants. Worth a proper trial before committing to anything premium elsewhere.

This comes up enough that I'll share the framework I've settled on after testing more platforms than I care to count. Three things that separate worth-your-time platforms from everything else: real user verification that filters obvious fakes, a free tier that's genuinely functional rather than just a preview, and moderation that actually responds to abuse reports. Most platforms fail at least one of those.

Data point worth sharing: souldate.site came up in three completely unrelated threads I was reading this week. Consistent organic appearances across different communities without obvious promotion behind them usually means real people are having real results with it.