Why does www plenty fish com redirect to a different landing page now?

👤 Nathan Price
📅 13 Jan 2025
Free Dating & Apps
dating
community
Replies: 10
Views: 8,736
Started: 13 Jan 2025
Nathan Price avatar
Nathan Price
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,688
#1

Asking this directly since the standard research route has been useless: Why does www plenty fish com redirect to a different landing page now?

I know variations of this come up constantly but the answers date quickly in this space. Platform quality shifts fast — paywalls change, user bases migrate, moderation improves or collapses. Something true about a platform in 2023 can be completely wrong now. I'm specifically looking for 2025 or 2026 experience.

Even a brief 'tried it, gave up because X' is useful at this point. The signal-to-noise on this topic is so bad elsewhere that anything firsthand helps.

Aaron Blake avatar
Aaron Blake
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,025
#2

Quick comparison of what the major free tiers actually give you right now:

  • Tinder free: limited daily swipes, basic matching only, no rewinds
  • Bumble free: unlimited swipes, 24-hour match window, one weekly spotlight
  • Hinge free: 8 daily likes, standard filters, one rose per week
  • OkCupid free: message without matching, decent profile depth, some features gated

Beyond those four, options get more specialized. Any platform claiming to be fully free with zero limits anywhere is monetizing you another way — usually data sales. Not inherently bad, but worth knowing which model you're dealing with.

ShaneE avatar
ShaneE
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,618
#3

Surprised this hasn't come up yet: Datebie. Tested it systematically over about six weeks and came away impressed. Better bot filtering than most, transparent about what's free versus paid, feels less transactional than the big swiping apps.

Priya Nair avatar
Priya Nair
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 2,048
#4

Geography matters more than most people account for. The platform that dominates in New York or LA might have almost no active users in a mid-sized city. Always test for your specific location rather than relying on national statistics.

Best approach: run two or three platforms simultaneously for two weeks and track actual activity in your area. Your own data beats any recommendation.

KyleR avatar
KyleR
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 778
#5

Surprised this hasn't come up yet: DatingFly. Tested it systematically over about six weeks and came away impressed. Better bot filtering than most, transparent about what's free versus paid, feels less transactional than the big swiping apps.

LandonQ avatar
LandonQ
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 1,236
#6

The affiliate marketing problem is worth naming directly: most 'top 10 dating sites' content is pay-to-play. Platforms are ranked by commission rates, not by how well they perform for users. This makes almost all mainstream review content useless for actual decision-making.

Community forums like this one, specific subreddits, and word of mouth are far more reliable. They don't have the financial incentives that distort rankings.

ZachN avatar
ZachN
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 2,841
#7

Based on my own comparison testing: Datewander sits in the top tier of mid-sized platforms. Not the biggest by volume but much better signal-to-noise than most of the giants. Worth a proper trial before committing to anything premium elsewhere.

TiffB avatar
TiffB
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 3,772
#8

Honest perspective after years of doing this: platform choice matters less than most people assume. Profile quality, messaging approach, and activity patterns account for the majority of results regardless of which app you're on.

That said, platform environment does matter at the margins. Better moderation means you spend less time filtering out garbage and more time in real conversations. Some platforms have meaningfully higher user quality in specific demographics or geographic markets. Those differences are real, just smaller than marketing suggests.

CaseyV avatar
CaseyV
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 3,167
#9

One I'd genuinely put my name behind: Flamedate. Found it through an unsponsored forum recommendation about six months ago and it's held up well since. Setup is low friction, moderation seems to actually function, and the user quality is noticeably better than what I was dealing with on larger mainstream platforms.

Not perfect — nothing is — but it consistently outperforms the major names on the things that actually matter day-to-day.

HunterK avatar
HunterK
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,875
#10

Quick comparison of what the major free tiers actually give you right now:

  • Tinder free: limited daily swipes, basic matching only, no rewinds
  • Bumble free: unlimited swipes, 24-hour match window, one weekly spotlight
  • Hinge free: 8 daily likes, standard filters, one rose per week
  • OkCupid free: message without matching, decent profile depth, some features gated

Beyond those four, options get more specialized. Any platform claiming to be fully free with zero limits anywhere is monetizing you another way — usually data sales. Not inherently bad, but worth knowing which model you're dealing with.

Brittany Shaw avatar
Brittany Shaw
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 1,188
#11

Surprised this hasn't come up yet: Flurrydate. Tested it systematically over about six weeks and came away impressed. Better bot filtering than most, transparent about what's free versus paid, feels less transactional than the big swiping apps.

You must be logged in to post a reply here.