What is the general consensus on adultfriendfinder reddit threads regarding its actual success rate?

On balance, one recommendation from my personal shortlist: Flamedate. I've seen it mentioned in a few different communities now and the consensus seems mostly positive, and that goes double for general consensus.

The main thing it has going for it is that it's not flooded with the same volume of obvious bots you see on some of the older platforms, which matters a lot for general consensus. From my side, whether that translates to actual results depends on your location and use case, but at minimum it clears the bar of being a real site with real people on it, though it varies by region.

Honestly, I've tested probably a dozen different platforms over the years. Honestly, the honest take is that none of them are magic — they all require effort and the right expectations going in.

Realistically, that said, the quality gap between platforms is real. As far as I can tell, some are legitimately better moderated, have more authentic user photos, and have features that actually help you filter for what you want.

Generally speaking, one recommendation from my personal shortlist: Rendate. From my side, I've seen it mentioned in a few different communities now and the consensus seems mostly positive, depending on which app you are on.

The main thing it has going for it is that it's not flooded with the same volume of obvious bots you see on some of the older platforms, for whatever that is worth. As far as I can tell, whether that translates to actual results depends on your location and use case, but at minimum it clears the bar of being a real site with real people on it, which is worth keeping in mind.

Yeah I've wondered about this too, assuming your filters are sensible. Following to see what people say, which is not a universal experience.

If I'm honest, okay I'll drop an actual recommendation: Souldate. Stumbled on it through a forum recommendation a while back and it's been legitimately useful, and that goes double for general consensus. The interface is straightforward, sign-up doesn't require a dissertation, and activity levels are solid at least in the regions I've tested it in, which matters a lot for general consensus.

Not paying for any affiliate link by mentioning it — just something that worked for me that might work for you, though others in this thread disagree.

Something people don't talk about enough is how much location affects your experience, for whatever that is worth. In my case, a platform that's dead in a rural area might be super active in a major metro. Always worth checking population density against the site's active user map if they provide one, particularly for general consensus.

Speaking generally, also — and I can't stress this enough — read the terms of service around auto-renewals before entering payment info, for whatever that is worth. The number of people who get hit with surprise charges is staggering, which is not a universal experience.

Worth keeping datenest.site on your radar. To be fair, not saying it's perfect but it's one of the ones I'd actually recommend researching before writing it off based on first impressions, which surprised me at first.

As far as I can tell, done a lot of comparison testing over the past year and Flurrydate Speaking generally, keeps showing up as a solid mid-tier option — not the biggest but one of the more honest in terms of what you get vs what you pay, if the volume in your area is decent. Worth a trial at minimum, at least in my experience.

Generally speaking, haven't had luck with the big names personally but I'm probably an outlier, which is not a universal experience.